Randomized trials in coronary bypass surgery.

نویسندگان

  • T Killip
  • T J Ryan
چکیده

CORONARY artery bypass grafting is an effective treatment for increasing myocardial blood flow in selected patients with coronary artery disease. After this procedure, symptoms improve, coronary blood flow to the affected area is increased, and exercise tolerance is enhanced.1 In patients who have received maximal drug therapy and yet remain intolerably symptomatic, bypass surgery clearly adds a brilliant therapeutic advantage, at least for a few years. More than a year has elapsed since the initial results of the Coronary Artery Surgery (CASS) randomized trial were published in Circulation,'2, providing ample time for the medical community to assimilate the data collected from the 6 year follow-up of the 780 patients with proven coronary artery disease who were randomly assigned to either continued medical therapy or coronary bypass surgery on entry to the study that began recruitment in August 1975. Extensive followup data from the two other large randomized trials are now available, so that it should be possible to identify quite precisely what unanswered questions remain regarding the effectiveness of the operation. Does coronary artery bypass prolong life over the long term? Does it affect the rate of subsequent myocardial infarction? Are there clearly defined subsets among patients with chronic stable ischemic heart disease who may uniquely benefit from operation? When the primary end point of all-cause mortality in CASS was examined for the entire population equally and randomly assigned to surgical or medical therapy, cumulative survival after 6 years was 92% and 90%, respectively. These data permit the conclusion that there is no statistically significant survival advantage in embarking on prompt bypass surgery for patients with coronary disease similar to those in the CASS randomized population, although it is recognized that important differences in outcome in carefully defined subgroups may be hidden in analysis of the population as a whole. Such a conclusion is consonant with the

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

The management of patients with stable angina and multivessel disease. PTCA or coronary bypass surgery?

In the 1970s and early 1980s, randomized trials comparing coronary bypass surgery with medical therapy emphasized the indications for coronary revascularization. In these trials and database studies, the major benefit of surgery over medical therapy upon survival was among 'sicker' patients, characterized by the severity of ischaemia, the extent of coronary disease and the presence of left vent...

متن کامل

A comparison of laboratory findings in coronary artery bypass surgery with and without cardiopulmonary bypass

Background : Quests for doing coronary artery bypass surgery by a technique with lower complications is going on, for this aim many studies compared patients undergoing CABG with or without cardiopulmonary bypass. This study was carried out to compare laboratory findings after coronary artery bypass in these two groups of patients. Materials and Methods: In a retrospective study, 167 patients ...

متن کامل

Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass versus stenting.

We readwith great interest the article by Boodhwani et al. [1] titled ‘Mortality and myocardial infarction following surgical versus percutaneous revascularization of isolated left anterior descending artery disease: a meta-analysis’. Randomized studies demonstrated a beneficial effect of surgery compared to percutaneous therapy on mid-term (1 month to 5 years) major adverse cardiac events (MAC...

متن کامل

Effect of respiratory exercises on the prevalence of atelectasis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery

Patients with coronary artery bypass (CAB) surgery are at risk of atelectasis. Use of respiratory exercises as effective approach has had controversy finding in CAB patients. This study aimed to determine the Effect of breathing exercises on the prevention of atelectasis in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery. Materials and method: In this randomized clinical trial, 80 patients...

متن کامل

Preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump to reduce mortality in coronary artery bypass graft: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION The intra-aortic balloon pump is routinely used in cardiac surgery; however, its impact on outcome is still a matter of debate and several randomized trials have been published recently. We perform an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that investigated the use of preoperative intra-aortic balloon pump in adult patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting....

متن کامل

Does off-pump coronary artery bypass reduce mortality, morbidity, and resource utilization when compared with conventional coronary artery bypass? A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

The authors undertook a meta-analysis of 37 randomized trials (3369 patients) of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery versus conventional coronary artery bypass surgery. No significant differences were found for 30-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.58-1.80), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.77; 95%CI, 0.48-1.26), stroke (OR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.33-1.40), renal dysf...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Circulation

دوره 71 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1985